[Mozilla Enterprise] (no subject)

James Pearson james-p at moving-picture.com
Wed Sep 18 12:15:57 UTC 2019


James Pearson wrote:
> 
> Mike Kaply wrote:
>>
>> Share your thoughts on ESR Release Cadence
>>
>> We would love your feedback in our current cadence of Firefox
>> Extended Support releases.
>>
>> Today, an ESR life cycle spans between 9 months to a year. We would
>> like to understand if a shorter life cycle, with more releases each
>> year, would help meet the needs of you and your organization.
>>
>> We believe faster cycles will allow more flexibility to back port
>> features and functionality to the ESR and will reduce occurrence of
>> web app compatibility issues that arise due to the ESR being too
>> outdated. While the ESR helps lower QA overhead through less frequent
>> updates, would a biannual release bring more benefits to you? Please
>> chime in on this feedback form<https://forms.gle/jdwWYKQ3inqP3jwL9>.
> I think the current (approx) yearly major version release is about right
> for us
> 
> I guess if you went to (say) a 6 monthly major version release, then you
> would need to keep a 6 month overlap - with each major release supported
> for a year - i.e. always have the latest and previous release supported

I notice Mozilla have announced that the Rapid Release schedule is 
moving to a 4 week release cycle from next year:

 
https://hacks.mozilla.org/2019/09/moving-firefox-to-a-faster-4-week-release-cycle/

Does this mean we will get ESR point releases every 4 weeks as well?

Also, does this mean the ESR major release schedule will have a 3 (or 
4?) point release overlap between major version releases?

Thanks

James Pearson


More information about the Enterprise mailing list