Survey results: web-ext
kmcmillan at mozilla.com
Thu Oct 5 22:43:32 UTC 2017
This is great feedback, thanks all!
We have a contributor working on the config patch (thank you, Elvina).
We do not have anyone working on the AMO submission command. Now that there
is no human reviewer blocking add-on submission, this command would be
If anyone would like to get involved, I can possibly make time to review
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 6:11 PM Andrew McKay <amckay at mozilla.com> wrote:
> A while back we sent out a survey about web-ext. Apologies for
> reporting the results so late, but I got a bit caught up in 57. If you
> missed it and you want to tell us about web-ext, please go to
> https://goo.gl/forms/zFzhgW0KkuxDxyhS2, we'd love your feedback.
> Here's my summarization of the results from 26 respondents,
> 73.1% of responders use web-ext.
> Some of the reasons give for not using web-ext where:
> * lack of webextensions APIs
> * storage API not being persistent
> * no chrome support
> * don't know what its for
> Which feature do you use the most?
> * run (89.5%)
> * build (68.4%)
> * lint (31.6%)
> * sign (15.8%)
> Which feature would you like to see?
> * Support for a config file to specify options (26.3%)
> > Bug https://github.com/mozilla/web-ext/issues/176
> * Ability to push listed add-ons to AMO (26.3%)
> > Bug https://github.com/mozilla/web-ext/issues/1096 added.
> * Improved testing options for your extension (21.1%)
> * Ability to create extensions from pre-defined extensions (10.5%)
> ...The rest had one or less responses.
> Anything else you want to tell us about web-ext?
> * Creating a fresh session every time is cumbersome
> * web-ext is a great addition to the add-on developer, thanks.
> Dev-addons mailing list
> Dev-addons at mozilla.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Dev-addons