[CBT] Culture Group Proposal
leo at mozilla.org.uk
Fri Jun 21 15:54:28 PDT 2013
I'm reluctant to say I haven't been following a lot of goings on
particularly closely lately (exams, ew.). Is there a wiki page somewhere
detailing the new working group structure (and said groups)?
On 21/06/13 17:32, David Boswell wrote:
> I agree that preserving and improving Mozilla's culture is definitely a worthwhile effort.
> I personally would rather see if we could take on projects that help achieve this in the working group structure we're setting up instead of trying to spin up an all new group.
> For instance, several of the project ideas mentioned seemed to be a good fit for the Education working group, including: creating best practices for communication channels and helping people learn more about why and how to be as open and inclusive as possible.
> ----- Original Message -----
>> I absolutely love this idea, and see such a group as essential for an
>> ever-expanding and rapidly growing Mozilla.
>> I wonder why there hasn't been much of a response to it on this list,
>> though. Is it because people think it's a good idea, but can't think
>> anything more to add to the conversation than just that, so don't
>> a reply because "I agree" is seen as rather a lame response, and a
>> number of them could be considered spammy? Or, is it that people
>> generally think this is a bad idea (though, if it were thought to be
>> that, surely there would be replies saying so)?
>> I'm sure it's the former but, and so it would be nice to see what
>> support exists for such a group. Hundreds of emails replying saying
>> would probably, yes, be quite spammy, so should we add some sort of
>> "backers" section to the etherpad?
>> I've said it before, and I'll say it again: I love this idea.
>> ~ Leo
>> On 5 June 2013 19:01, Majken Connor <majken at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> Last fall I had an idea for a group that I think would be
>>> beneficial for
>>> Mozilla. Ever since then I see more examples and talk to more
>>> people that
>>> this group would benefit. I have been thinking for a little bit now
>>> Community Builders might be the right group to take up the idea and
>>> recent discussion started by Brian about packaging our best
>>> practices is a
>>> great fit. I think areas of the original proposal are naturally
>>> being covered by the CBT. I have a few more thoughts that I haven't
>>> in the proposal, but I will leave those out for now in favor of
>>> people's reactions and feedback to the original idea.
>>> Etherpad with my original proposal is here if you want to leave
>>> content following: https://etherpad.mozilla.org/cultureproposal
>>> Culture Group Proposal
>>> What would be the purpose of this group?
>>> The culture group would continuously study and evaluate Mozilla's
>>> culture as
>>> a community and suggest and promote ways to preserve and improve
>>> it. The
>>> group would give community members a place to discuss how Mozilla
>>> is living
>>> up to its values, identifying ways Mozilla is successful that
>>> they'd like to
>>> see continue, as well as being able to address concerns and make
>>> Why not use governance?
>>> For this group to thrive they should feel free to have a higher
>>> ratio than many working mailing lists prefer. Governance works well
>>> as a
>>> very low noise list where people make concrete proposals and
>>> discuss the
>>> organization of the Mozilla project.
>>> What projects would fit under the culture group?
>>> The conductors group is a great example of a Mozilla project
>>> designed to
>>> support the culture of the community. So are the community
>>> Mitchell et al have been working on. New contributor orientation
>>> also fits.
>>> The group could identify and support ways for teams to better
>>> include and
>>> recognize their volunteers, suggest best practices for
>>> channels, and other actions that could help Mozilla be as open and
>>> as possible.
>>> Who would be in the group?
>>> As it would not be a formal team with specific authority, everyone
>>> should be
>>> welcome into the group, however there should be identified leaders.
>>> For the
>>> group to thrive contributors working on the identified projects
>>> would be key
>>> and are good candidates for leadership. Ideally all Mozilla teams
>>> representation in the group.
>>> What resources would the group need?
>>> I believe a mailing list would be enough to start, the group could
>>> identify what other resources would be beneficial.
>>> Community-building mailing list
>>> Community-building at mozilla.org
>> Community-building mailing list
>> Community-building at mozilla.org
> Community-building mailing list
> Community-building at mozilla.org
More information about the Community-building