[CBT] Criteria for the evaluation of potential contributor-management services.
mhoye at mozilla.com
Mon Jun 10 09:59:37 PDT 2013
Yeah, absolutely; that's worth breaking out into its own category.
Let's call that "flexibility going forward", or something - we expect
that a good-faith effort from everyone involved will facilitate building
new features in the future, or something that effect.
On 2013-06-07 4:45 PM, David Boswell wrote:
> This may already be captured under Usability and Accessibility, but is flexibility a requirement worth calling out? For instance, the two systems we've looked at so far are built with employees in mind so they'll need to be flexible to work in a situation where the audience isn't employees.
More information about the Community-building